翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Hubert de Burgh, 1st Earl of Kent ・ Hubert de Burgh-Canning, 2nd Marquess of Clanricarde ・ Hubert de Bèsche ・ Hubert de Castella ・ Hubert de Givenchy ・ Hubert Derache ・ Hubert Deschamps ・ Hubert Detremmerie ・ Hubert Deutsch ・ Hubert Dijk ・ Hubert Dilger ・ Hubert Dinwoodie ・ Hubert Doggart ・ Hubert Douglas Henderson ・ Hubert Dreyfus ・ Hubert Dreyfus's views on artificial intelligence ・ Hubert Drouais ・ Hubert Duggan ・ Hubert Dupont ・ Hubert Duprat ・ Hubert Déquier ・ Hubert Eaton ・ Hubert Eaves III ・ Hubert Ebner ・ Hubert Edward Dannreuther ・ Hubert Egemann ・ Hubert Egger ・ Hubert Eisner ・ Hubert Essame ・ Hubert Evans Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Hubert Dreyfus's views on artificial intelligence ： ウィキペディア英語版 Hubert Dreyfus's views on artificial intelligence Hubert Dreyfus has been a critic of artificial intelligence research since the 1960s. In a series of papers and books, including ''Alchemy and AI'' , ''What Computers Can't Do'' (; ; ) and ''Mind over Machine'' , he presented a pessimistic assessment of AI's progress and a critique of the philosophical foundations of the field. Dreyfus' objections are discussed in most introductions to the philosophy of artificial intelligence, including , the standard AI textbook, and in , a survey of contemporary philosophy.〔Note also that Dreyfus was one of the only non-computer scientists asked for a comment in IEEE's survey of AI's greatest controversies. 〕 Dreyfus argued that human intelligence and expertise depend primarily on unconscious instincts rather than conscious symbolic manipulation, and that these unconscious skills could never be captured in formal rules. His critique was based on the insights of modern continental philosophers such as Merleau-Ponty and Heidegger, and was directed at the first wave of AI research which used high level formal symbols to represent reality and tried to reduce intelligence to symbol manipulation. When Dreyfus' ideas were first introduced in the mid-1960s, they were met with ridicule and outright hostility. By the 1980s, however, many of his perspectives were rediscovered by researchers working in robotics and the new field of connectionism—approaches now called "sub-symbolic" because they eschew early AI research's emphasis on high level symbols. Historian and AI researcher Daniel Crevier writes: "time has proven the accuracy and perceptiveness of some of Dreyfus's comments." Dreyfus said in 2007 "I figure I won and it's over—they've given up."〔Quoted in 〕 == Dreyfus' critique == 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Hubert Dreyfus's views on artificial intelligence」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.